Indigenous Rock the Vote: Mobilizing for Change in 2025

Your Voice Matters – Your Vote Counts During the 2025 federal election in Canada, the importance of Indigenous participation in the politica...

Comparing Mark Carney's 2025 Liberal Plan to Trudeau’s Record: What Does It Mean for Indigenous Peoples?

As Canada’s 2025 federal election approaches, the political landscape is shifting with new leadership under Mark Carney. As we evaluate the Liberal Party’s election plan under Carney’s leadership, it’s essential to compare it with the current Liberal government’s record under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau—especially in terms of its impact on Indigenous peoples.


While Carney's platform offers ambitious goals and a focus on economic reconciliation, some areas of concern and gaps in comparison to Trudeau’s actual policy actions need to be examined.


1. Economic Reconciliation: Carney’s Vision vs. Trudeau’s Actions

  • Mark Carney’s Plan:
    • Carney's platform emphasizes economic prosperity for Indigenous peoples as a key element of reconciliation. He proposes economic partnerships to increase participation in Canada’s economy, aiming to create good jobs, economic security, and growth in First Nations, Inuit, and Métis communities.
  • Trudeau’s Record:
    • Under Trudeau, the government has made significant investments in Indigenous communities, including Indigenous housing, healthcare, and education. Trudeau’s government has also focused on economic programs that include Indigenous youth entrepreneurship and employment.
    • However, Indigenous communities continue to face challenges related to economic inequality, and some of the promises on economic reconciliation remain unmet. The clean water crisis and housing shortages are examples where action is still required.

Comparison: Carney’s platform emphasizes economic reconciliation with Indigenous participation at its core, but it lacks concrete measures that have been seen in Trudeau’s term, such as funding for specific Indigenous programs or direct action on urgent needs like clean drinking water.

2. Indigenous Self-Determination: Carney’s Commitment vs. Trudeau’s Efforts

  • Mark Carney’s Plan:
    • Carney proposes working in full partnership with Indigenous peoples and advancing self-determination. His platform highlights support for Indigenous-led processes in areas like education, health, child welfare, and community safety.
  • Trudeau’s Record:
    • Trudeau’s government has made substantial progress in supporting Indigenous self-determination with initiatives like self-government agreements, the Indigenous Languages Act, and the Indigenous Child and Family Services Act (Bill C-92).
    • However, challenges remain in empowering Indigenous communities to fully exercise self-governance, especially in remote areas and communities that still rely on federal intervention for basic services.

Comparison: Carney’s commitment to Indigenous self-determination mirrors some of Trudeau’s initiatives, but the implementation of these programs under Trudeau’s government has faced significant challenges, particularly in terms of resources and capacity building for Indigenous communities to take on full governance.

3. Addressing Historic Injustices: Carney’s Pledge vs. Trudeau’s Accountability

  • Mark Carney’s Plan:
    • Carney promises to move forward with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action and support Indigenous communities in addressing the unmarked graves of residential school children.
    • He also expresses support for implementing the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls and calls for justice through a national action plan.
  • Trudeau’s Record:
    • Trudeau’s government has made significant strides in addressing historical injustices, including advancing residential school compensation, supporting landmark legislation like Bill C-92 on Indigenous child welfare, and taking steps toward closing the gap in services between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples.
    • However, Trudeau’s action on MMIWG and the uncovering of unmarked graves at residential schools has been slow, with many Indigenous leaders pointing to the government’s inadequate response.

Comparison: While both Carney and Trudeau acknowledge historical wrongs, Carney’s plan lacks the specific programs that Trudeau’s government has begun to implement, though progress has often been slow or stalled due to bureaucratic barriers and lack of follow-through.

4. Clean Water: Carney’s Silence vs. Trudeau’s Ambiguity

  • Mark Carney’s Plan:
    • Carney's platform is notably silent on the clean water issue, which continues to be one of the most pressing needs for many Indigenous communities. While he discusses economic reconciliation, clean drinking water—a fundamental human right—is not directly addressed in his plan.
  • Trudeau’s Record:
    • Trudeau’s government made a significant promise to eliminate long-term drinking water advisories in First Nations communities by 2021. While progress has been made, many communities are still waiting for clean water, and some advisory issues persist.
    • However, the lack of timely action and implementation of these promises remains one of the criticisms of Trudeau’s term.

Comparison: Carney’s failure to address clean water is a significant gap in his platform compared to Trudeau’s government, which at least acknowledged the issue and made commitments. The lack of clean water in Indigenous communities remains a key issue that needs immediate attention in any reconciliation plan.



Conclusion: Comparing Visions for Indigenous Peoples

Both Mark Carney’s and Justin Trudeau’s platforms acknowledge the importance of reconciliation and the need to advance Indigenous rights. However, there are distinct differences in how these commitments are structured and presented.

Carney’s plan is ambitious, but it lacks the specifics needed to address the urgent needs of Indigenous communities, especially on issues like clean water. Trudeau’s record, though imperfect, includes more concrete actions on self-determination, historical reconciliation, and social issues like child welfare and language preservation.

For Indigenous peoples, the question remains: Will these commitments result in real change, or will they be another round of unfulfilled promises? The challenge for Indigenous voters in the 2025 election is to ensure that meaningful action on these issues remains the top priority for all political leaders.

#cdnpoli #IndigenousRockTheVote Indigenous Rock The Vote IndigenousRockTheVote.ca